the Name
is bren

2024-25 // Project Management & design strategy

Design for America

Overview

Design for America is a national organization that is focused on using design-thinking strategies to solve systemic problems in our society. They have chapters at a wide variety of universities across the United States.

The Johns Hopkins Carey Business School and MICA joint chapter needed to restore the historic, robust nature of the organization at both universities. We found that leading consulting projects and design sprints throughout the school year would build a solid member base and increase consistent engagement each year.

Discovery

who does what and what do we do?

As a team, we wanted to understand how each member works best and plan the next year based on strengths. Luckily, we were able to customize our programming to our interests, which made it easier to plan. We had three individuals willing to participate in leadership for the year, but ended the year with two, so we altered and shifted the roadmap throughout based on bandwidth.

We decided that our vision for the year was to increase engagement and interest at both universities. We wanted to focus internally, so that, in future years, the team can expand on its existing member base.

how might we increase engagement?

Design for America at JHU + MICA did not track its member base, so we were not able to work with or contact students who were involved in recent years. We decided to hold information sessions and post on the LinkedIn page to make the organization known.

We also had a member of the leadership team focus on partner engagement. They were able to reach out to possible local and virtual partners that could either support us throughout the year or host a consulting project.

what resources best educate our audience?

With the national organization of Design for America focusing on educating students and professionals on the practice of design-thinking, we felt that it was important to host synchronous discussions on important design topics.

Along similar lines, we felt that the best way to learn and practice was in-person involvement, so we decided to plan and implement a full-day, design-thinking conference.

Delivery

what are the team dynamics?

For the student-led consulting projects, we wanted to define the general team dynamic before the teams were even formed. We decided to have five roles: Project Manager, Designer, Business Analyst, Subject Matter Expert, and Data Analyst. The consultants were assigned roles but had to define responsibilities themselves.

Each project was so nuanced that this role differentiation and freedom of responsibility promoted adaptability amongst the consultants.

what do the projects look like?

Design for America had established a design-thinking process that each university could adopt and promote. The process was 1) Identify, 2) Immerse, 3) Reframe, 4) Ideate, 5) Built, and 6) Test. We decided to complete a step of the process each week with the consultants, so they were six to eight weeks long.

Each week we conducted a two-hour workshop with the consultants based on the current phase in the process, which included a descriptive presentation, collaborative exercises, and work time.

what is the end goal?

By the end of the consulting project, the consultants were required to present their process and high-fidelity prototype to the project partner. Along with the presentation, the Project Manager needed to package the information utilized and created for the project partner to reference and implement.

prototype of five screens from a mobile application for neurodiverse individualsprototype of one mobile application that utilizes AI for Johns Hopkins Carey Business School

Results

The consulting project length was an issue for the consultants, as they were required to do a lot of work in a short amount of time. We predicted this issue and felt that it was important for the consultants to not obsess over minute details, but, unfortunately, the intense speed negatively impacted quality.

Surprisingly, participation in programming that involved practice was immense. We had full consulting teams, design-thinking conference, and project partner opportunities. Participation that involved discussion and no practice was underwhelming. We found that students and partners wanted to educate themselves by putting in the work, rather than just listening or talking.

One project partner shared, "The team blew us away. Thank you so much for this amazing opportunity to collaborate with Design for America. We are so excited by the research and insights found by the team. Their work will be invaluable to [our] development. Their professionalism was unmatched and communication was top-tier. It was truly a pleasure to partner with the team!"